“Cointelegraph Disables Comments” Coin Telegraph disabled comments

“Cointelegraph Disabled Comments”
“Cointelegraph.com Disabled Comments”

Cointelegraph has always had a bias against Bitcoin, and recently, I can only infer that they weren’t too happy with some of the comments on their platform calling them out on the flimsy articles they were posting. They would perpetually provide a platform for the most idiotic pencil pushers, and I’ll provide an EXAMPLE.

All the comments are gone on this post now: https://cointelegraph.com/news/equity-fund-ceo-recommends-to-steer-clear-of-crypto-advises-to-focus-on-basic-goods

However, at one point, I had posted:

“VISWANATHAN SHANKAR IS A TAX COLLECTOR. He sat on the board of The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore.

https://www.iras.gov.sg/IRASHome/uploadedfiles/IRASHOME/Publications/About%20Us(2).pdf

I never understand why Cointelegraph reports on stuff like this. Who cares? How is this relevant? Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt – WOW talk about money laundering and unethical brutality. Why does Cointelegraph give a platform to this trash? If you want to invest in the developing world, there are way better places than those. I get it, Jesus ate with the tax collectors, but a brainwashed moron like this, is it any wonder why he says this kind of stuff?”

That EXPOSED the fact that they are giving a platform to the most imbecilic, far orbiting, vaguely related people in the space. They are supporting an INSTITUTIONAL agenda, and spreading the message of COMPLIANCE in an Orwellian manner. Coin Telegraph should be called out on their B.S. What do they do when they get called out? BLOCK COMMENTS. Comments are no longer available on Cointelegraph.com, but it’s not because they were flooded with them – no way, by no means, they might have gotten 10 comments at a time or so. It wasn’t anything over the top.

Also, Cointelegraph always takes the most OBTUSE perspectives on issues, and here’s another EXAMPLE:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-regulators-approach-to-crypto-is-obstructing-innovation-ex-congressman

“US citizens’ failure to take them to court is obstructing freedom. Who has money to prosecute the government’s obtuse perspectives and ignorance of the constitution, which protects freedom of speech, data publication? which is really what bitcoin is – freedom of speech. Right to use money to support a cause also has protection under the first amendment, as well as arguments of restraint of trade. When will the community get its act together and spend some of the 120 billion dollars of valuation on an effort to assert our rights in court?!”

They also love to quote Nouriel Roubini, who is a clear shill for the big banks. In short – COINTELEGRAPH does not stand for Bitcoin or the movement behind cryptocurrency, but rather has a pro-regulation, pro-big government agenda subtly built into their commentary as a bias.

Discussion on cointelegraph.com 1 comments
Top 5 Crypto Performers Overview: Binance Coin, Cardano,… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem 21 days ago
Wow, your scam organization totally ignored Augur, which is at the crux of this most recent dip. Augur is up 120% over the past few weeks, but no mention. Huh, I wonder why? Maybe because they will replace the entire derivatives mechanism for all bets placed on all commodities, meaning $500 Trillion could move into crypto.

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 4 comments
US Regulators’ Approach to Crypto Is Obstructing Innovat… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
US citizens’ failure to take them to court is obstructing freedom. Who has money to prosecute the government’s obtuse perspectives and ignorance of the constitution, which protects freedom of speech, data publication? which is really what bitcoin is – freedom of speech. Right to use money to support a cause also has protection under the first amendment, as well as arguments of restraint of trade. When will the community get its act together and spend some of the 120 billion dollars of valuation on an effort to assert our rights in court?!

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 9 comments
St. Louis Federal Reserve Report: Increased Supply of Al… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
Cointelegraph really outdoes themselves as a shill for the bankers. FRONT PAGE for the weekend! Really? Wow. What a bunch of traitors. They don’t have crypto interest at heart. They think we give a fuck about the Fed. FED UP!

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 16 comments
Winklevoss Twins Confirm Commitment to Bitcoin ETF Durin… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem george_M a month ago
Dear George,

I hope all is well. I think that if the SEC allowed a Bitcoin ETF, it would make it on the open stock exchange, which would mean that hedgefunds and other institutions would be able to buy it as an investment, which would mean that it would be subject to BORROWING. People could literally borrow money to buy the ETF with the risk being this: https://www.investopedia.co… So, I don’t think the Fed would like that much.

View in discussion
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem george_M a month ago
Was mulling it over, George, and I think the best way to do a Bitcoin ETF is to establish custody and never allow movement of the funds, but instead create a tether token that’s pegged to the bitcoin, which is then permitted to trade and be relinquished as a private, non custodial, non decentralized Blockchain. Take a look at the Bit 10. https://www.google.com/amp/…

View in discussion
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem george_M a month ago
That’s fine, George, and I get it. I really do. However, my concern is the custodians themselves. Someone somewhere had to make the wallets. What’s to stop them from absconding with the coins of the ETF? If I were a regulator, I’d demand that there be a 3 of 5 custodian arrangement where it takes three people to move the coins. Where are the codes stored? In a vault, I assume, but then anyone actually hoping to withdraw coins would have to go through a major ordeal, and then the three of five custodians would have to get together each time they want to move the coins. Is this feasible? What are the requirements to be a custodian?

View in discussion
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem Poder Requohem a month ago
And by the way, Bitcoin will still surpass any valuation of gold. It should eventually be about 3x the value of the bond market, with cryptocurrency at around 6x the valuation of the bond market.

View in discussion
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
OK, Look, here are the reasons why you’ll never get a bitcoin ETF, and you SHOULDN’T.

1) Bitcoin is overly fungible. It’s like bearer bonds on steroids. Once it has moved, it’s gone. There are multi-signature wallets, of course, but still, the whole concept that something can move digitally and be gone for good and never show up again should scare the shit out of regulators who are accountable to ignorant investors.

2) People should hold their own Bitcoin and crypto, and that is because it prevents exchanges from fractional reserve. Period. Put your coin in your own wallet. If you don’t feel comfortable holding that much money in a single place, then good, because that’s why this form of money is DECENTRALIZED. Decentralized in format —- AND in distribution of VALUE!

3) If an ETF got approved, then fiat currency valuations would flow into Bitcoin holdings, and that would be really bad for the global economy.

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 76 comments
Coinbase Reportedly Bans Personal Account of Social Medi… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
If you are banned on coinbase, raise your hand. Glad to see we have so many prosperous bitcoiners in the room this evening.

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 5 comments
Equity Fund CEO Recommends to Steer Clear of Crypto, Adv… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
VISWANATHAN SHANKAR IS A TAX COLLECTOR. He sat on the board of The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore.

https://www.iras.gov.sg/IRA…

I never understand why Cointelegraph reports on stuff like this. Who cares? How is this relevant? Saudi Arabia, UAE and Egypt – WOW talk about money laundering and unethical brutality. Why does Cointelegraph give a platform to this trash? If you want to invest in the developing world, there are way better places than those. I get it, Jesus ate with the tax collectors, but a brainwashed moron like this, is it any wonder why he says this kind of stuff?

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 2 comments
Bitcoin, Ripple, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, EOS, Stellar, L… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem a month ago
Yeh, yeh, it’s easy to say it’s in this channel or in that channel, but what about the bigger factors like who wants to be a government slave, or why do corporations control everything? Don’t you think the 1% controlling 95% or more of the wealth is a problem? Don’t you think the price has shown rather tough resistance to thus far to efforts to force sellers? This is a real revolution – not for the light hearted or a bunch of pansies in suits who run for the first dollar. This is our lives at stake here. We will revolt and disobey the global hegemonies. We will take back the planet that is rightfully ours and the destiny of our children’s children to travel the stars.

View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 7 comments
Roger Ver: ‘Undercover US Government Agents Go on LocalB… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem 4 months ago
People who want to effect this world say something.
People who wish they could leave the world alone say nothing.
People who wish they could make a better world and be left alone like the world they wish would be buy bitcoin.

2 View in discussion
Discussion on cointelegraph.com 23 comments
Nouriel “Dr. Doom” Roubini: “99 Percent of Cryptocurrenc… | Comments
Poder Requohem
Poder Requohem 4 months ago
Nouriel Roubini is a classic Zionist whose agenda is clearly to see Bitcoin fail, because Bitcoin opposes the global monetary cabal., and he is a faithful employee. The Cabal depends on free flowing money from WASHINGTON to ISRAEL in order to pay for, “defense,” AKA, “war,” that supports the Zionist agenda. Roubini believe his words effect reality, but we have our words, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this comment is banned by cointelegraph, as all the bitcoin news outfits have recently turned against the cryptocurrencies. At least I’m trying to say something in opposition to his perspective. Why does this man get the time of day from the crypto currency community? He is a stooge for the world banks.

View in discussion

Fluoride Complaint – Fluoride is a regulated, unapproved drug

COMPLAINT

Abstract:

Fluoride is added to the public water supply by an unelected board (the OWASA board).  OWASA physically adds fluoride to the water in order to increase the level of this chemical.

After having requested numerous times to find out what form of fluoride is added to the water, they have remained silent.

Fluoride is a prescription drug. For instance, some of the forms of fluoride are listed under the following drug names ReNaF, and Ludent. These all have National Drug Code Numbers (from here on referred to as NDC #s).

There are plenty of reasons not to add fluoride to the public water supply. I will discuss many of them in detail during the body of this complaint. There are many technical, legal, scientific, and medical reasons why this chemical should not be added to public water supplies, and I will be outlining as many of them as possible in detail. However, what I ask the court to consider the most is whether or not it is ethical for a drug (a medicine) to be added to the public water supply and whether or not this violates the fundamental rights and freedoms of people. This current practice is especially concerning when there are many citizens who object to water fluoridation and do not consent to consume this drug. I am then left to conclude, as I hope you will, that the practice of water fluoridation is an extreme prejudice acting against those who do not want to consume the drug fluoride, because the water utility cannot be reasonably be avoided in restaurants, public places, and the environment of the town in general. Adding fluoride to the water is also the practice of medicine as defined under the laws of the State of North Carolina.

OWASA is violating both the spirit and the letter of numerous NC General Statutes by their distribution of fluoride into the public water supply.

  1. Addition of fluoride to the public water supply is in violation of North Carolina G.S. § 90-18.  Practicing without license; penalties. § 90-1.1

The following definitions from the N.C. General Statutes will be helpful to anyone attempting to ascertain the validity of my argument that addition of fluoride to the public water supply is a violation of several general statues including, but not limited to the one listed immediately above.

§ 106 – 145.2. Definition

(9) Prescription drug.

A human drug required by federal law or regulation to be dispensed only by a prescription, including finished dosage forms and active ingredients subject to 21 U.S.C. § 353 (b). Only for the purposes of the provisions of this Article, the term “prescription drug” shall include pseudoephedrine products as defined in G.S. 90.

First of all, Fluoride is a prescription drug. A quick search in the Food and Drug Administration’s website for  the National Drug Code Number 51862-171-10 will yield a result indicating clearly that this is the corresponding drug code number to fluoride and it has a categorized Product Type Name: HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG (Exhibit A). Furthermore, this specific National Drug Code Number applies a brand name ReNaF fluoride tablets.  These two documents (the search result for the a drug code number of fluoride and the label of ReNaF fluoride tablets) are attached as exhibits A and B respectively.

As one can see clearly on the label of this prescription drug, the active ingredient is the fluoride ion. A finer point would be that both the prescription drug label and search of the FDA database for fluoride provide evidence that fluoride is intimately connected with the delivery of the fluoride ion (electrically charged particle). For further reference, “North Carolina General Statutes § 90-89.1 Treatment of controlled substance analogues” indicates that a drug by any other name or configuration is still that very same drug.

Furthermore, a drug is well defined:

North Carolina Controlled Substances Act Article 5

  1.      “Drug” means a. substances recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; b. substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; c. substances (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals; and d. substances intended for use as a component of any article specified in a, b, or c of this subdivision; but does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories.

Fluoride is defined by the FDA as a “human prescription drug” as evidenced by Exhibit A. Fluoride is also classified under FDA marketing category as “Market Category Name : UNAPPROVED DRUG OTHER.” To better understand what this means, I looked up the following from the WWW.FDA.GOV website. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Transparency/Basics/ucm213030.htm

“What are unapproved drugs and why are they on the market?

The original Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906 brought drug regulation under federal law. That Act prohibited the sale of adulterated or misbranded drugs, but did not require that drugs be approved by FDA. In 1938, Congress required that new drugs be approved for safety.  In 1962, Congress amended the 1938 law to require manufacturers to show that their drug products were effective, as well as safe. As a result, all drugs approved between 1938 and 1962 had to be reviewed again for effectiveness.  To be consistent with current regulations and to ensure that all drugs have been shown to be safe and effective, all new drugs are required to have an approved application for continued marketing.

Many healthcare providers are unaware of the unapproved status of drugs and have continued to unknowingly prescribe them because the drugs’ labels do not disclose that they lack FDA approval.   In addition, since many unapproved drugs are marketed without brand names and have been available for many years, it is often assumed that these unapproved drugs are generic drugs.  This is not correct. Generic drugs have been evaluated and approved by FDA to demonstrate bioequivalence to a brand name reference drug.  Healthcare professionals and consumers can be assured that FDA-approved generic drug products have met the same quality, strength, purity and stability as brand name drugs. Additionally, the generic manufacturing, packaging, and testing sites must meet the same quality standards as those of brand name drugs. Unapproved drug products have not been evaluated and approved by FDA. Unapproved drugs are not generic medications, and neither their safety nor their efficacy can be assured.”

OWASA (Orange Water and Sewer Authority) has several notable and relevant attributes related to this case:

  1. They are not an elected board.
  2. They add fluoride to the municipal water supply.
  3. They have been made aware that fluoride is a prescription drug and continue to add it to the water supply.

As of 2012, OWASA’s Water Quality Report Card http://owasa.org/client_resources/whatwedo/drinking%20water/02-owasa%20water%20quality%20report-2012_8-pager_r7_web.pdf  (Exhibit C), one can see how fluoride is added in the amount of .66 PPM, which is the same thing as .66 mg per liter of water. One ppm is equivalent to 1 milligram of something per liter of water (mg/L).

Fluoride as a prescription drug comes in the following doses: .25 mg, .5 mg, 1.0 mg (Please refer to Exhibits B, D, E). This means that if a citizen of the town drinks one liter of municipal tap water, he is getting more than twice the amount of fluoride legally considered to be a drug. As stated earlier, fluoride is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). ReNaF discontinued being marketed in 2010, but Ludent is still marketed to this day.

Here is some basic information about both of these drugs, both of which are administered by prescription only:

ReNaf Fluoride Chewable Tablets 1.0 mg are round, pink, cherry flavored tablets in a 120-count bottle, NDC# 68032-384-12 and a 1000-count bottle, NDC# 68032-384-00.

ReNaf Fluoride Chewable Tablets 0.5 mg are round, white, grape flavored tablets in a 120-count bottle, NDC# 68032-383-12 and a 1000-count bottle, NDC# 68032-383-00.

ReNaf Fluoride Chewable Tablets 0.25 mg are round, cream colored, vanilla-flavored tablets in a 120-count bottle, NDC# 68032-382-12.

LUDENT: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=6e7a7e17-7538-4763-810c-7e56bd630494

Each tablet contains 0.25 mg Fluoride from 0.55 mg Sodium Fluoride. White to off-white, orange flavor, round-shaped chewable tablet. Debossed “SCI” on one side and 1006 on the other. NDC 44946-1015-2 (60 count) , NDC 44946-1015-3 (120 count), NDC 44946-1015-6 (30 count blister).

Each tablet contains 0.5 mg Fluoride from 1.1 mg Sodium Fluoride. White to off-white, orange flavor, round-shaped chewable tablet. Debossed “SCI” on one side and 1007 on the other. NDC 44946-1016-7 (7 count sample size), NDC 44946-1016-2 (60 count), NDC 44946-1016-3 (120 count), NDC 44946-1016-6 (30 count blister).

Each tablet contains 1.0 mg Fluoride from 2.2 mg Sodium Fluoride. White to off-white, orange flavor, round-shaped chewable tablet. Debossed “SCI” on one side and 1004 on the other. NDC 44946-1017-2 (60 count) , NDC 44946-1017-3 (120 count), NDC 44946-1017-6 (30 count blister).

OWASA admittedly puts fluoride in the water to promote better dental health.  This is an excerpt from their website:

“Fluoridation of drinking water

In accord with recommendations of the American Dental Association, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health-related organizations, OWASA adds fluoride to drinking water to help prevent tooth decay. The  level of fluoride in our water is about 0.7 of one part per million. (One part per million is like a penny is $10,000.)”

Source: http://owasa.org/drinking-water/#treatment

Furthermore, they have dedicated an entire webpage to explaining why they are putting fluoride in the water. http://owasa.org/fluoride-v3

OWASA does not have a medical license. Who has the authority to dispense prescription drugs in the state of North Carolina?

N.C. G.S. § 90-1.1. (5) c.  Definitions. indicates that practicing medicine includes:

Offering or undertaking to prevent or diagnose, correct, prescribe for, administer to, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, or devices any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, defect, or abnormal physical or mental condition of any individual, including the management of pregnancy or parturition.”

It is patently clear that OWASA is attempting to practice medicine without a license to do so and/or the consent of each person to whom they dispense fluoride, because they say that they want to prevent or mitigate tooth decay by administering a drug to the whole population. They are not elected. Furthermore, I’d argue it’s well known that doctors prescribe drugs to individual patients. It has been demonstrated that fluoride is a human prescription drug and a prescription only drug. Corporations typically do not issue prescriptions, doctors do. I do not give my consent to be medicated or drugged with fluoride. I therefore have the right to not be discriminated against by being denied regular access to non-fluoridated water (water that has had fluoride added to it). I have the right to not consume this drug when I drink water from the faucet like everybody else.

What is a prescription label? How must a prescription drug be dispensed?

§ 90-85.29.  Prescription label.

The spirit and letter of GS 90-85.29 indicates that a prescription drug must be dispensed with a label:

“The prescription label of every drug product dispensed shall contain the brand name of any drug product dispensed, or in the absence of a brand name, the established name.  The prescription drug label of every drug product dispensed shall:

(1)        Contain the discard date when dispensed in a container other than the manufacturer’s original container.  The discard date shall be the earlier of one year from the date dispensed or the manufacturer’s expiration date, whichever is earlier, and

(2)        Not obscure the expiration date and storage statement when the product is dispensed in the manufacturer’s original container.

As used in this section, “expiration date” means the expiration date printed on the original manufacturer’s container, and “discard date” means the date after which the drug product dispensed in a container other than the original manufacturer’s container shall not be used.  Nothing in this section shall impose liability on the dispensing pharmacist or the prescriber for damages related to or caused by a drug product that loses its effectiveness prior to the expiration or disposal date displayed by the pharmacist or prescriber. (1979, c. 1017, s. 1; 1981 (Reg. Sess., 1982), c. 1188, s. 3; 1993, c. 529, s. 7.5.)”

Furthermore, see: § 90-85.28.  Selection by pharmacists permissible; prescriber may permit or prohibit selection; price limit on selected drugs. There, you will see how there are even further standards by which drugs are supposed to be dispensed by a pharmacist.

OWASA is not a pharmacist or a pharmacy. Under § 90-85.3. Definitions.

(a) “Administer” means the direct application of a drug to the body of a patient by injection, inhalation, ingestion or other means. OWASA is administering drugs without a license to do so. Patently, OWASA is violating the law and an injunction on the practice of adding fluoride to the water needs to be ordered in order for the law to be upheld.

I urge the reader of this complaint to research and contemplate the vast number number of ways in which the spirit and letter of the law is being violated by the addition of fluoride to the public water supply.

Of particular import is Ҥ 90-85.3A. Practice of pharmacy.

(a) A pharmacist is responsible for interpreting and evaluating drug orders, including prescription orders; compounding, dispensing, and labeling prescription drugs and devices; properly and safely storing drugs and devices; maintaining proper records; and controlling pharmacy goods and services.” OWASA is not a pharmacist. OWASA does not have a license, which is defined as, “‘License’ means a license to practice pharmacy including a renewal license issued by the Board.”

§ 90-85.21B. Unlawful practice of pharmacy.

It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation not licensed or registered under the provisions of this Article to:

. (1)  Use in a trade name, sign, letter, or advertisement any term, including “drug”, “pharmacy”, “prescription drugs”, “prescription”, “Rx”, or “apothecary”, that would imply that the person, firm, or corporation is licensed or registered to practice pharmacy in this State.

. (2)  Hold himself or herself out to others as a person, firm, or corporation licensed or registered to practice pharmacy in this State. (2003-284, s. 10.8D.)

The relevant statement here is that OWASA is implying that they are authorized to dispense drugs (medication) through the public water supply. By dispensing drugs through the public water supply (yes, they are dispensing the drug, fluoride), OWASA is “holding itself out to others as a corporation that is licensed to practice pharmacy.” I will again note, and please see attached labels and exhibits (A, B and C) that fluoride is a prescription only drug. Although OWASA does not state that they are a pharmacy, by acting to practice medicine without a license and dispensing drugs openly, this is the only conclusion one might come to if you were to assume they are not violating the law. The vast majority of residents to not have a prescription for fluoride, and many do not consent to drinking fluoride. I do not consent to it. This is  a form of discrimination.

http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_90/GS_90-85.29.html

Not only is OWASA adding a prescription only drug to the water supply, they are adding an unapproved drug in the manner of WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION without the consent of the people to whom they are distributing the drug. They are doing so without a license to do so or the consent of citizens who are forced to spend non-trivial money and time to obtain sources of water without fluoride (a drug and medication) in them. This complaint argues that this is wrong, unethical and illegal.

Within all of the laws that regulate drugs, pharmacists and the licensing of those who are allowed to prescribe, dispense and distribute drugs is the idea that you have to be prescribed a drug and be licensed in some way to distribute drugs. This is the spirit of these laws, and their lettering indicates that prescription only drugs may not be distributed without prescriptions, and that people distributing drugs have to label the drugs they distribute, be licensed, and adhere to the rules and regulations regarding the distribution of drugs. See § 90-85.21.  Pharmacy permit.

Firstly, OWASA is administering a drug (medicine) to everyone without discretion on an individual basis. As demonstrated earlier within this complaint, the administering of a prescription only drug (fluoride) constitutes Offering or undertaking to prevent or diagnose, correct, prescribe for, administer to, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, or devices any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, defect, or abnormal physical or mental condition of any individual, including the management of pregnancy or parturition,” and in order to do this, OWASA must have a medical license. Numerous other citizens and I, within the county and town, do not consent to OWASA’s unlicensed or licensed medical administering of drugs through the public water supply (see fluoride exhibits A, B, and C).

Furthermore, OWASA is operating without a wholesale distribution license for the fluoride that they distribute to non-consenting citizens (see legal definitions of distribution and license if necessary).

Please review § 106-145.1. Purpose and interpretation of Article 12A.
Wholesale Prescription Drug Distributors for definitions and reference to the validity of the following argument:

  It has been shown that OWASA is indiscriminately putting fluoride into the public water supply, and I now argue that by doing so, OWASA is manufacturing (propagating) a prescription drug on a wholesale scale without a license and distributing it to people who do not have prescriptions for the drug they are distributing.

Wholesale distribution. – Distribution of a prescription drug to a person who is not a consumer or patient, other than any of the following types of distributions:

f. The sale, purchase, or trade of a prescription drug; an offer to sell, purchase, or trade a prescription drug; or the dispensing of a prescription drug pursuant to a prescription.

§ 106-145.3. Wholesale distributor must have license.

(a) Requirement. – Every wholesale distributor engaged in the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs in interstate commerce in this State shall obtain a license from the Commissioner for each location from which prescription drugs are distributed and shall renew each license annually.

OWASA sells the drugged water to residents in the town and does not have a license to do so. I would argue that it can be held as a common fact that many (most) residents do not have fluoride prescriptions.

  1. Fluoride is a toxin.

Aside from fluoride’s technically being a drug as codified by the Nation Drug Code Directory by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America, I will also illustrate how fluoride is classified by chemical companies and hazmat agencies as a toxic substances that is a verifiable health hazard, corrosive agent and poison (European Union). Most recently, the country of Israel banned the addition of fluoride to their public water supplies.

3. Addition of fluoride to the public water supply is in violation of the Constitution of the State of North Carolina

Section 1.  The equality and rights of persons.

We hold it to be self-evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness.

Commentary: Section 1 of the North Carolina Constitution outlines the equality of humans. That one person’s rights shall not be infringed upon by either government or other individuals is clear in this section. Section 1 indicates that all beings have the right to life. It has been shown that fluoride is a toxin. In conjunction with the other sections of North Carolina’s Declaration of Rights, I shall outline how introduction of fluoride infringes upon the very essence of liberty to decide what one puts in their own body. This section says that I am equal to other citizens. This is important when considering a free, sane man’s right not to liberty and life while not drugged against his consent by an unelected board of water and sewer engineers.

Sec. 2.  Sovereignty of the people.

All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.

Commentary: OWASA is not an elected board, and it does not consist of health professionals, but yet it enacts health policy (See Exhibit. This in essence goes against the will of the people.

Sec. 5.  Allegiance to the United States.

Every citizen of this State owes paramount allegiance to the Constitution and government of the United States, and no law or ordinance of the State in contravention or subversion thereof can have any binding force.

Commentary: The addition of a drug into the public water supply violates the idea and spirit of this section, because the FDA has determined fluoride to be a prescription drug (as detailed earlier in this complaint). Addition of fluoride into the public water supply subverts the law of the United States that indicates fluoride to be given by prescription only.

Sec. 7.  Suspending laws.

All power of suspending laws or the execution of laws by any authority, without the consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights and shall not be exercised.

Commentary: By adding fluoride to the public water supply, OWASA has suspended the law that a physician must write a prescription for a prescription drug and a pharmacist must dispense that prescription drug to the patient in a prescription labeled bottle according to the letter and spirit of § 90-85.29.  Prescription label. OWASA is not elected. OWASA’s behavior is injurious to the rights of the people, for their behavior violates the law and the people have no representation in their actions.

Sec. 13.  Religious liberty.

All persons have a natural and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience.

Commentary: The framers of the constitution found religious freedom so important that they specifically noted that conscience must play a role in ethical governance. Muslims as well as many different religions believe that it is wrong to ingest toxins. This is a commonly known fact. Fluoride has been shown through the attached exhibits to be a toxin. It is against many people’s religions including my own to ingest toxins. It is against the way in which I and many others worship Almighty God to ingest fluoride, and in combination with sections 1, 19, and 35  of the NC Constitution, specifically, my religious freedoms are being violated. People who worship Almighty God in such a way so as to avoid toxins, which is a perfectly natural and common way (acceptable on its face) of practicing the worship of Almighty God, are having their liberty infringed, because they are forced to spend costly time and effort avoiding this toxin, because it is so ubiquitously introduced into society (through the tap water). People who worship Almighty God and in doing so, feel the need to avoid the toxin (drug), fluoride, are thereby being discriminated against by the state in this matter via the unelected OWASA board.

Sec. 19.  Law of the land; equal protection of the laws.

No person shall be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land.  No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws; nor shall any person be subjected to discrimination by the State because of race, color, religion, or national origin.

As just described in the commentary on religious freedom, fluoride, being a toxin, deprives one of life, liberty, and in a certain sense, property, because we are forced to spend extra money to purchase water that does not contain fluoride, which other members of society are not forced to do if they accept the consumption of fluoride or are not aware that they are consuming fluoride. Those who do not want to drink fluoride have the right to not to consume fluoride, as it has been classified as a drug and it has not been prescribed to them, and they are free citizens. Their rights are protected by the constitution.

Sec. 35.  Recurrence to fundamental principles.

A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty.

We must examine the ethics of adding a drug to the water supply. This chemical is not approved by the FDA as a drug, yet it is being added to the public water supply. In many counties, there has never been a referendum on addition of fluoride to the public water supply.

Sec. 36.  Other rights of the people.

The enumeration of rights in this Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people.

Please acknowledge that the right of the people to not have a drug forced upon them is present in the constitution through the enumerated ways, but also see how it is unethical in and of itself. People who do not wish to ingest a drug have that right insofar as they are sane, rational individuals who have committed no crime. If a drug is administered on a mass scale, this is wrong. Those who wish to abstain from partaking in the ingestion of a drug have the right to access water that does not have drugs in it, since public water ought be provided equally to people regardless of religion or  drug preference.

Having followed this train of thought, these expositions of violations of the North Carolina General Statutes, can one be any more sure that the issuance of a PERMANENT INJUNCTION should be immediately issued? Furthermore, ought not the one who brought about the PERMANENT INJUNCTION and brought a halt to this terrible violation be rewarded monetarily while the perpetrator of this abuse be punished monetarily? Please issue a permanent injunction to stop the practice of putting fluoride into the public water supply. Please issue a permanent injunction against the administering of a drug to the whole population of the county by the OWASA.

From Article 5.

North Carolina Controlled Substances Act.

(12)      “Drug” means a. substances recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; b. substances intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; c. substances (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals; and d. substances intended for use as a component of any article specified in a, b, or c of this subdivision; but does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories.

North Carolina General Statutes § 90-89.1 Treatment of controlled substance analogues

http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/90-medicine-and-allied-occupations/90-89.1.html

END of the European Union: Marine LePen Emanuel Macron AKA Mr. Macaroni

Realize for a moment how everyone depends on money, and then realize how sick that really is. Did you ever dream of a world where people had access to food, clean water without FLUORIDE, fruits, vegetables, seeds, storage, oh wait… life takes a lot of work, but still! C’mon! If your Father had planted 50 trees for you, would you not be a wealthy man of produce? Then, you would realize, money is not the answer, so, therefore, also is governance not the answer, because government naturally tries to suck the produce off of the people and transfer it into the hands of the governing, spending money on nothing but death and destruction! What a scam the Euro really is. All forms of money are a scam, but some are less of a scam than others. Bitcoin is less of a scam. With the Yellow Vest protests and the introduction of bitcoin into Tobbacconist shops in France, when better is the time to reject the concept of government controlled currency?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-17/marine-le-pen-says-leaving-euro-no-longer-priority

France doesn’t need to leave the Euro, because the Euro is bullshit. What does it really do? Can it feasibly collect taxes? Does it spend more than it should? Does it provide any real form of protection? Does it defend the rights of humans to defend themselves with weapons? No, no, no, no, no, no, and no. So, what the fuck is it good for? Do you believe Google will give this post any visibility in the search engine? No, so what does it matter?

You would be be surprised how much your words matter!

Still! Imagine what would happen if France rejected the Euro for bitcoin? Just imagine! What would happen to the Euro? Why can’t the Yellow Vests organize around cryptocurrency? Is this a cry for help? Because God gave it to you right there, and the inventor didn’t ask for anything. Embrace Bitcoin today! Our Freedom awaits!

SonIQ – Let Freedom Sing

SonIQ – Let Freedom Sing

Toward a Blockchain Music Market-Play 

Parker Emmerson | myblogband.com

ABSTRACT

The independent music talent pool is richer than ever, but its pockets are empty. Corporate middle-men and streaming, ad-based platforms have monopolized the marketplace by enabling steals of songs,  and in the process depriving talented independent artists as well as superstars major earning potential. We think the contemporary music economy needs to change in order for music cultures and subcultures to flourish. It needs to adopt innovative ways of bringing revenue directly to musicians to empower and incentivize them to produce better, faster, stronger, keeping our music industry alive and thriving. The patented innovation we propose is the integration of our media-oriented cryptocurrency, SonIQ, into our patented online social network for musicians, MyBlogBand (US20100326256 A1, US8487173 B2, US8962964 B2), to allow for seamless licensing, payment, distribution, and collaboration of independent music, media and even artificial intelligence.

INTRODUCTION

Independent music has gained enormous steam since the advent of the internet. In recent years, listeners have grown jaded with radio’s limited, formulaic offerings and turned to the web for free or cheap access to raw, talented musicians all over the map. But whether this buffet of independent music can outlast listeners’ appetites depends on indie artists actually making a good living from their popularity, which internet platforms haven’t engendered so far. Lacking profits, artists have been resorting to grueling tours, like troubadours of olden days.

An argument for cheapening the music industry is that consumers are accustomed to not pay, and consumers are the boss. But because the state of things is not sustainable, whoever provides a viable alternative first will become a disruptive pioneer and a champion of democracy.  We live in a time in which the importance of sustainability is more apparent and appealing than ever. We think cryptocurrency can be seamlessly integrated into the user experience and eventually prove its own value as consumers see music quality and availability improve through the use of this payment system. 

MyBlogBand will be a patented, custom-tailored cryptocurrency social network for multimedia artists that will let them prove their contributions to media as well as license media access and return ownership of content as access to a library of data. This feature is distinct from iTunes, Spotify, Pandora and other streaming music services: iTunes only allows limited access to purchased media by authorized devices with non-transferable license. The others don’t grant ownership of content, limit accessible content types to music and limit themselves to popular, syndicated artists, making it harder to discover new artists and indie musicians.

BACKGROUND/PROBLEM STATEMENT

1) Artists have a hard time quickly and efficiently distributing their content and receiving adequate payment. Too much money is given to middlemen, and only a few artists dominate the heard music. We need to rectify the situation so independent music scenes can thrive.

2) Time-stamping and proof of authorship.

3) Fast and easy distribution of payments for content.

SOLUTION

1. MyBlogBand: MyBlogband is committed to honoring the freedom and trust of musicians and listeners worldwide by re-investing in small and indie artists, and protecting the diversity, integrity and accessibility of the global music library for listeners. With the help of SonIQ, Blogband wants to ensure trust that every artist will get paid well as they deserve, that their music will be accessible and affordable, and that there will be privacy all around. Blogband enables a simple, direct and transparent payout structure using SonIQ in which indie rates can be the same as  those of big artists. Money goes directly to the artist rather than trickling down through platforms or labels. Artists get bigger per-stream royalty rates and the option to offer easy paid downloads, to sell CDs and monetize other artist products, and to monetize donations through fan-funding platforms similar to those of Patreon.

Myblogband LLC has been around since 2007 and was re-branded as Blogband LLC once the patent was awarded (US8487173). We have a strong IP asset package marketed by a top IP asset attorney and entrepreneur – but we are still young and growing. Our vision for establishing IP and solid business growth involves media licensing and integrating Bitcoin. In addition, we are seeking interested parties who would like to invest in making Blogband a real challenge to the status quo of music distribution platforms and the establishment music industry. Social network for musicians to collaborate online in a band that they start or join. Distributed payments to contributors over a custom-tailored cryptocurrency network — SonIQ — that uses licensing.

a) Claims of the social media music network.

b) Mechanics of the licensing smart contracts.

c) Band members input their cryptocurrency addresses and automatically receive payment for their percentage contribution to a song upon initial sale of the song through the platform and all subsequent copies generated through sending.

2. A Digital Media Wallet on MyBlogBand will allow licensing via SonIQ, a custom-tailored cryptocurrency for the social media framework. The idea here is to use the cryptocurrency styled mining network to facilitate the licensing of media, be it video, audio or visual. Licenses to access media would be generated using the Bitcoin network in the SonIQ embodiment over a social media framework of MyBlogBand, an idea currently addressed in my patent-pending CIP application. It could also license content through the cryptocurrency network node with individual licenses to media stored on a Cloud server.

What is a Bitcoin network node? A Bitcoin network node is a record of all Bitcoin transactions that have taken place that is current and up-to-date with the current issuance of all Bitcoins and transactions of all Bitcoins. The same is true for a node of any current cryptocurrency. This idea of a node is essential to the concept of a crypto currency or cryptographic ledger technology. People who operate computers that are used to solve the encryption algorithm that issues crypto-currencies (Bitcoin, Litecoin, etc.) are referred to as miners, and it is their job to see to it that Bitcoins are issued within the constraints of the open source software project. Bitcoins are entries into the distributed, cryptographically protected ledger that indicate a positive balance located at a cryptographically protected address. Bitcoin addresses are generated by operating a Bitcoin node and indicating that one would be able to accept Bitcoins when they are sent to a particular string of numbers that was generated within the constraints of the Bitcoin software protocol.

What is a Bitcoin wallet? A Bitcoin wallet is a positive balance located at a Bitcoin address. Bitcoin wallets are either Cloud based or stored on a hard drive. Access is granted to a Bitcoin wallet/address when a Bitcoin node has the correct private, cryptographic key (set of numbers) to send Bitcoins from that respective address.

How are licenses to media contained and protected in this embodiment? Given an individual piece of media, for example a song, entitled “Song 1,” authorization to play the song, copy the song, transfer the song or sell the song would be granted

using a cryptographic key issued by a mining network such as the Bitcoin network/protocol. A user’s online account would be credited with access to the media

over a suite of different hardware/software platforms that have access to this data stored on “the Cloud.” Cryptographic keys that grant access to the media would be stored on the Cloud and all the user would have to do is log into their account. Users could transfer those cryptographic keys to be stored locally on hardware. A “wallet” software is used to organize the cryptographic keys that grant access to data, therefore turning it to consumable media. The wallet organizes the data+cryptographic keys as a cryptocurrency node on the cryptocurrency network in a Graphic User Interface such that it is easily accessible through a browser. In this embodiment, the keys are still held on the Cloud, so the media is accessible wherever the data is available so long as the user is logged into his Cloud account. The cryptocurrency, distributed ledger technology is simply used to maintain the licenses to transform data into media.

How are media licenses transferred from one person to another? By means of access to the Cloud account, the user may transfer these licenses using a website or by having his local Media Wallet transfer the licenses from the Cloud server to another wallet or Cloud account. Any format of media may be transferred.

How do licenses operate in conjunction with data to grant access to content? A cryptocurrency, or distributed ledger technology (synonymous), works with a public address and a private key. A decentralized encrypting network (like the Bitcoin network) maintains the history of all transfers/transactions that take place. Data is downloaded from many different distributors and platforms, with the downloading/receiving of data, licenses to access the content are also conferred to a public address, the private keys to which are held on a Cloud server or local disk. All of this is made available to the user through their Media Wallet.

How is content finally delivered to the end user? Once the user has the data, the private key that grants access to the data or balance, which is enshrined by the Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency network at a particular address also grants access to the data, thereby turning it into media, because a centralized or distributed database of media files verifies the presence of the correct keys at the cryptocurrency node through either proof of stake (proof that there is the presence of the key) or transfer of the key one time per media usage to the owner’s own wallet.

3. Licensing media as granted access to a host of media stored on a Cloud server.

The owner of a private key that corresponds to the correct respective value on a cryptocurrency network is also granted access to a subscription style service of media.

4. Licensing media content through a Bitcoin network node with individual licenses to

particular pieces of media stored on a local server/computer/hard-drive/wallet.

Data is downloaded and locally stored licenses (private keys) grant access. The private

keys can be transferred from one address to another address on a cryptocurrency

network or the balance located at an address that signifies access to the data can be

sent to another address, and thus access to the media is conferred that way.

5. Licensing media content through a Bitcoin network node with individual licenses to a host of media stored locally.

6. A custom-tailored cryptocurrency — SonIQ — for the express purpose of granting media licensing on the basis of distributed, cryptographic ledger technology. A wallet that can organize and categorize different kinds of licenses to different kinds of media using a multitude of cryptocurrency platforms including the cryptocurrency platform that has been custom-tailored to make media licensing easier. Cryptographic network- mining network (present, existing, or novel and tailored). . Further, we hope to allow for the tokenization of media content through a digital media crypto-wallet, so that virtual items in games can be included in the ownable content transferable over a blockchain. Virtual weapons, clothing, items, cars, or any acquirable object in a video or computer game can be tokenized, held, synced, and transferred between games, users and players for different devices, terminals, consoles or games for different purposes.

7. We want to be adaptable to future technologies, so our eye is also on integrating AI structures. Artificial intelligence robots can integrate different robot features, buy and trade different parts of themselves as assets.

Basic terms:

License node – An up-to-date record of the presence of all licenses.

Direct send – The transfer of both the data for media and the cryptographic token by which the data is allowed to be media.

License authorization key – Generated by the network of the custom cryptographic,

distributed ledger/currency when a content owner/provider/generator receives payment via Bitcoin, the aforementioned custom currency or other currency.

Media Wallet – a cryptocurrency wallet that contains access keys to different kinds of data.

License for different purposes: right to perform the song, right to play the song in a venue, right to copy the song, right to sell the song, right to distribute the song.

Screen Shot 2018-12-22 at 11.04.16 PM Screen Shot 2018-12-22 at 11.04.10 PM Screen Shot 2018-12-22 at 11.04.03 PM

Welcome

Blogband LLC was rebranded from Myblogband LLC in 2013 upon the patenting of the collaborative, online workspace under http://www.google.com/patents/US8487173 

The World is Listening Re-defining the music industry. Come play with us. Leading the way to a label free life.
The World is Listening
Re-defining the music industry.
Come play with us.
Leading the way to a label free life.
Blog Band of the week

Mobile Bunker – Blogband of the Week

MOBILE BUNKER

What a great song – Mobile Bunker deserves band of the week this week!!! Download Crash Test Creature

MOBILE BUNKER: http://www.myblogband.com/bands/id/47

 

Transdevotion

Transdevotion – Blog Band of the Week

The band of the week this week is… TRANSDEVOTION! Band Members: Steven Dutch and Daniel Erdos

Transdevotion
Band of the Week on Myblogband.com Blogband.com Transdevotion

About Blogband

When my High School band, The Reckless Clinic was about to break up and go to college, I wanted us to keep collaborating, so we gave birth to Myblogband.com in 2007, a patented social network for musicians to collaborate online. Over the next years, I worked on getting a patent, knowing how hard it is to develop a web company from scratch. Over the years, I learned more about the internet, web design and web functionality. Now, we have Myblogband.com and the intellectual property asset package behind it. Rebranded under Blogband LLC, the next wave of the future is the creating of online, real bands by real, human musicians in a virtual band workspace through Blogband LLC’s patented technology. Future patents and patented technologies are coming. Join us today at http://www.myblogband.com

Tutorial

MyBlogBand.com is a great way for musicians to connect to other musicians online and exchange music and ideas. It is also a great way for listeners to discover new bands and musicians they might like as they can search for bands and musicians by genre. Several bands and musicians are featured on the home page, and the most played songs are listed in on the home page.

Registration

To participate in MyBlogBand.com, a user must register. To register, a user must enter a username, email and password. If the username or email are already in use, the user must pick another. Once registered, the user is logged in and can post comments to a band page. They also may continue on to become musicians. Any registered user can post comments on the band profile page.

Musicians

Musicians can fill out a profile, post pictures and tracks for others to listen to. Any of this can be edited at any time by logging in. Musicians may also participate in bands by starting a band and inviting other musicians to join, or auditioning for one of the many bands already on the site. To log in, enter your username and password in the log in boxes at the left hand column. If you’ve forgotten your password, you may click on “email me my password” and your password will be mailed to your email address. Once logged in, the log in box goes away, and a menu with various options appears in the left hand column. If you did not create a musician profile when you registered, you can create one now. If you have already created a musicians profile, you can view your profile by clicking on “view profile”. You can make changes to or delete your profile by clicking on “edit my profile”. It is important to choose genres that represent your music, as that will help others with similar interests find you. It is also important to choose instruments that you play, the amount of time you have been playing that instrument, and the state you live in as this information will be used by other musicians on the site to find you.

You can change your password by clicking on the “change my password” link in the left hand column. You can add and remove images from your image gallery by clicking on “manage my images”. Images are uploaded by selecting a local file using the “Browse” button and then clicking “Upload”. Only jpeg images should be uploaded. Images can be reordered by using the pulldown boxes next to each image and selecting which position you would like that image to occupy. The first image is used as the thumbnail image for your musicians profile page, so choose an image that you like. You can add and remove tracks from your profile by clicking on the “manage my tracks” link. Tracks can be uploaded by selecting the file using the “Browse” button and then clicking on the “Upload” button. Depending on the type of connection you have, it may take several minutes to upload a track. Do not click on anything else while a track is uploading. Only MP3 tracks will be playable by the online player. Tracks must be named before they are uploaded.

Bands

Musicians can participate in bands in several ways. A musician may start a band. A band has a profile very similar to the musician profile. It is important to choose genres that are representative of this band so other musicians and listeners can find the band. Bands also have image galleries that work identically to the Musician image gallery described above. Once a musician creates a band, they can invite other musicians to join the band by searching for them using the “Musicians” menu item at the top of the page.

If you have at least one band, and the musician is not in that band, a link will show up on that musicians profile page called “invite this musician to join your band”. This will open a page where you select the band that you want to invite them to join and an optional message. An email will be sent to the invited musician. They can log in and accept your invitation. Band members should create at least one song that is representative of the band. This is done by clicking on the band name in the left hand column and then clicking on “manage band music”. This will open a page where any current songs are listed, and a link to add a new song is available. Add a new song by clicking on the “add a new song” link and filling in a title and optional description. Once the song is created, tracks can be uploaded for this song. A song may have many tracks as the song develops and new parts are added. Tracks are added by clicking on the “tracks” link under the song on the “manage band music” page. Select a local file using the “Browse” button and then click “Upload”. Please wait for the upload to complete as it may take some time depending on the type of internet connection you have. The first track uploaded becomes the “public” track for this song and is the one that shows up on the band profile page for this song. You can add notes for this track so that others know what the track is. You can make this a “private” track so that only other band members can see it, and you can decide if you want to make it downloadable by others.

As more tracks are uploaded, you can decide which one is the “public” track. For instance, if you add a guitar solo to the song, you can upload a mix that includes this solo and make that the “public” track. Any musician can audition for any band that they are not already in. To do this, find a band using the “Bands” menu item at the top of the page, and click on the “audition for this band” link. This will allow you to upload a track for a song. The band members will get an email. A band member can log in, find the band and song that the musician has auditioned for, and listen to the track. The band members can keep the track or delete it. If they like the musician, they can invite them to join the band by clicking on their name and clicking on “invite this musician to join your band” on the profile page as described above.

Blog Band
Blog Band